India’s 0–2 loss to South Africa at home has sparked intense scrutiny not just of the team, but also of those responsible for shaping it. As questions mount, the BCCI has finally broken its silence on the criticism aimed at chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar.
Two Home Whitewashes Raise Tough Questions
Just months ago, India celebrated a gritty 2–2 draw against England. But the recent defeat to South Africa has shifted the mood, exposing glaring gaps in planning and execution at home.
Ever since Gautam Gambhir took charge as head coach and Ajit Agarkar stepped in as chairman of selectors, India has suffered two home Test clean sweeps—first to New Zealand in 2024, and now to the Proteas in 2025. This has inevitably brought their decision-making under the microscope.
Why Agarkar Is Facing Criticism
While Gambhir has absorbed most of the backlash, Agarkar’s choices have also come under fire. Since taking over in 2023, he has tested nearly 30 players in the Test squad—a level of experimentation that many believe has hurt stability.
He received praise earlier this year for backing Sarfaraz Khan, Dhruv Jurel and Rajat Patidar during the England series. But he is now being blamed for overlooking Sarfaraz and Abhimanyu Easwaran, two consistent domestic performers.
The Big Concern: Lack of Domestic Match Visits
One of the key criticisms is that Agarkar has not watched enough Ranji Trophy matches in person.
While he has been a constant presence during India’s overseas tours and major home Tests, he has rarely been seen at domestic venues. This has widened the perceived gap between him and the domestic circuit.
During this period, players like Sai Sudharsan and Nitish Kumar Reddy received Test debuts despite below-par first-class averages, which has further frustrated long-time domestic performers such as Sarfaraz Khan, Karun Nair, and Easwaran.
BCCI’s Stance: ‘Scores Are on the App’
Despite the noise, the BCCI has not shown major concern regarding Agarkar’s limited domestic presence.
A top official said that the selectors have access to all scorecards digitally, implying that in-person attendance is not essential.
“We will speak to the selectors too (on the Test debacle), and as far as watching domestic games is concerned, every score comes on the app,”
— a BCCI official told Times of India.
The board, however, has confirmed that it will discuss the South Africa series outcome with the selection committee.
Agarkar’s International Presence vs Domestic Absence
Agarkar has been highly visible during high-profile tours—such as the Border–Gavaskar Trophy against Australia and the Anderson–Tendulkar Trophy against England.
But when it comes to the Ranji Trophy, his visits have been few. His last significant appearance was at a 2024 match between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka in Chennai, just before Devdutt Padikkal was handed his first Test call-up.
Interestingly, this is not new. During his time as a Mumbai selector, Agarkar faced similar accusations of skipping local matches.
What Happens Next?
With India struggling at home and selection choices under heavy scrutiny, conversations between the BCCI and the selection panel are expected to be crucial. Whether this leads to structural changes or simply course correction remains to be seen.
One thing, however, is clear: India’s recent performances have reopened a long-standing debate about balancing domestic success with international potential—and Agarkar is right at the centre of it.
Catch every update on Cricket News, Match Predictions, Fantasy Tips, and Live Cricket Action—only on The Cricket Scores!
